In a culture of infinite choice, taste is less about knowing what is popular than recognizing what deserves attention
Good taste is often treated as an instinct—an almost mysterious ability to recognize what is elegant, original or culturally important. In reality, taste is a form of judgment developed through attention, context, comparison and editing.
Scroll long enough and everything begins to resemble everything else.
The same interiors appear in apartments thousands of miles apart. The same archival references resurface across fashion campaigns. The same songs soundtrack millions of videos. A visual language that once belonged to a particular place, scene, or community becomes instantly reproducible, circulating through mood boards, recommendation feeds, online shops, and generative tools until originality and familiarity become difficult to separate.
Access is no longer the problem. The internet has placed decades of fashion, art, music, film, criticism, and design within reach. The more difficult question is what to do with all of it.
That is where taste enters.
Taste is often described as instinct: a mysterious ability to recognize what is elegant, interesting, or culturally important. But treating it as an inborn gift gives it too much mystique. Taste is better understood as a practiced form of judgment—the ability to notice, compare, contextualize, select, and edit.
It is not simply knowing what looks good. It is understanding why something works, what it references, and whether it contributes anything beyond surface appeal.
“Taste is not knowing what everyone likes. It is knowing what deserves attention.”
Taste Is More Than Personal Preference
Personal preference says, “I like this.”
Taste asks, “Why does this work?”
That distinction matters. Liking something is immediate and personal. Evaluating it requires attention. A person with developed taste can appreciate an object without wanting to own it, recognize the intelligence of an idea that does not suit their style, or explain why something technically polished still feels culturally empty.
Research in aesthetic psychology offers one explanation for why familiar things so easily feel appealing. A widely cited review on “processing fluency” proposed that people tend to respond more positively to objects that are easier for the mind to process. Repetition, symmetry, clear contrast and familiarity can all increase that ease. In other words, something may feel good partly because it is recognizable—not necessarily because it is exceptional.
Taste requires looking beyond that first sensation.
It appears in the choices people make: the artists they follow, the clothing they combine, the spaces they create, the restaurants they recommend, and the ideas they decide are worth sharing. It is visible not only in what someone includes, but also in what they leave out.
This does not mean good taste belongs to one class, institution, or visual tradition. It cannot be reduced to minimalism, luxury, obscurity, or restraint. Maximalism can demonstrate extraordinary taste. So can camp, street style, vernacular design, underground music, and work that intentionally challenges conventional ideas of beauty.
Taste is not a fixed look. It is the quality of the judgment behind the look.
Taste Is Not the Same as Following Trends
Trends tell us where collective attention is moving. Taste helps us decide whether that movement is interesting, meaningful, or likely to last.
The distinction is especially important online. Social-media companies use algorithms to determine and organize the flow of content people see, recommend material they may like, select advertisements and support moderation decisions. The feed is not a neutral window onto culture; it is a constructed sequence shaped by platform systems.
Many users understand that influence. In a 2024 Pew Research Center study, 66% of people who consumed news on X and 61% of those who did so on TikTok said the platforms influenced what they were seeing at least somewhat.
Once a particular aesthetic performs well, it can be copied, simplified, and distributed at remarkable speed. What begins as a specific cultural expression becomes a content template, marketing category, or purchasable “look.”
A person with taste may still participate in trends. The difference is that they do not surrender their judgment to them. They consider where a trend originated, why it resonates, and whether it fits within their own point of view.
Being early is not the same as being discerning. Taste involves recognizing the idea beneath the trend before mass repetition strips it of context.
It also requires knowing when not to participate.
Skill Can Make Something. Taste Decides What Should Be Made.
Skill and taste are often treated as interchangeable, particularly in creative industries. They are not.
Skill is the ability to execute. Taste is the ability to evaluate the execution.
A technically gifted photographer may produce images that are flawless but forgettable. A designer may understand every available tool while lacking a meaningful point of view. A writer may construct polished sentences without saying anything that stays with the reader.
Taste directs skill. It determines which idea deserves development, which reference adds depth, which element should be removed, and when a project is finished.
This distinction has become increasingly important as generative technology makes production faster and more accessible. Artificial intelligence can create hundreds of images, headlines, layouts, and concepts in seconds. Volume, however, does not guarantee value. Someone still has to decide which option carries meaning, which feels derivative, and which deserves refinement.
As explored in AI Isn’t Replacing Creativity, the human advantage is not merely the ability to generate. It is the capacity to select, interpret, challenge, and transform. Taste is not made irrelevant by new creative tools. It becomes more valuable because of them.
“Skill expands what you can make. Taste determines what is worth making.”
Why Taste Matters Now
When information was scarce, access created authority. Today, authority increasingly comes from filtration.
The most valuable editors, curators, stylists, critics, DJs, creative directors, and founders do not simply know more than everyone else. They help other people navigate abundance. They identify connections, provide context, and reduce noise.
This work has measurable cultural and economic value. UNESCO has described cultural and creative industries as a major driver of the digital economy, contributing more than $200 billion in global digital sales. Taste is not merely a lifestyle accessory within that economy; it guides what is commissioned, promoted, preserved, purchased, and remembered.
A trusted recommendation can introduce an unknown designer to an international audience. A curator can reshape the way an overlooked artist is understood. A stylist can revive an archive. A critic can supply language for a cultural shift that audiences have felt but not yet articulated.
This authority is connected to Cultural Capital: the knowledge, references, language, education, and social codes that help people navigate particular cultural spaces.
The relationship between taste and social position was central to French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu’s influential 1979 book Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Bourdieu argued that judgments of taste also operate as forms of social positioning—not simply as neutral assessments of beauty or quality.
Exposure matters. Education matters. Access matters. Not everyone begins with the same opportunities to encounter art, travel, books, design, mentorship, or influential communities.
Yet taste should not be confused with performing exclusivity. Knowing an obscure reference does not automatically make someone discerning. Neither does rejecting everything popular.
At its best, taste is not a tool for proving superiority. It is a way of paying closer attention.
Can Taste Be Bad?
Taste is subjective, but that does not mean every judgment is equally informed.
Creative work can be examined through context, intention, coherence, originality, execution, and cultural awareness. A choice may be intentionally excessive, awkward, sentimental, or provocative and still demonstrate strong taste because it understands the tradition it is entering.
“Bad taste” can even become an artistic strategy. Camp, satire, punk, kitsch, and numerous subcultural movements have deliberately rejected respectable standards. Their power comes from intention. They understand the rules well enough to distort them.
Weak taste, by contrast, often reveals itself through imitation without understanding. It borrows symbols without context, reproduces aesthetics without credit, or mistakes expense and prestige for quality.
Developed taste asks where an idea came from, who shaped it, what it originally meant, and what changes when it enters a different cultural setting.
How to Develop Better Taste
Taste can be learned, but not through a single list of approved books, films, designers, or destinations. It develops through repeated acts of attention.
Begin by moving beyond the algorithm. Recommendation systems can introduce valuable work, but they also tend to reinforce established preferences. Visit archives. Read older magazines. Watch films outside your usual genres. Listen to full albums. Spend time in galleries, libraries, independent shops, public spaces, and unfamiliar neighborhoods.
Study context rather than collecting images. Ask who created something, what conditions shaped it, and what it was responding to. The more context you understand, the less likely you are to confuse novelty with originality.
Comparison is equally important. Place several strong examples beside one another. Notice differences in proportion, rhythm, material, restraint, tone, or intention. Excellence becomes easier to recognize when it is examined rather than passively consumed.
Learn to articulate your response. Replace “I love it” or “I hate it” with precise language. Is the work coherent? Is it emotionally effective? Does it rely too heavily on reference? Is the execution supporting the idea or distracting from it?
Finally, make something. Taste sharpens through decisions. Writing, styling, photographing, designing, cooking, or curating forces you to choose and then revise those choices. Editing develops discernment because it reveals what a project can survive without.
Taste Is a Practice
Good taste is not a personality type, a price point, or membership in the correct cultural circle. It is a practice of looking carefully and deciding deliberately.
It also requires flexibility. As knowledge expands, judgment should change. Revisiting an artist, object, or idea and seeing it differently is not inconsistent. It is evidence that your perspective has developed.
The goal is not to become difficult to impress. It is to become more precise about what impresses you and why.
In a culture built around speed, imitation, and endless recommendation, taste offers something increasingly rare: a considered point of view. The internet may give everyone access to the same references. What remains valuable is the ability to recognize which ones still have something to say.
What's Your Reaction?
